Skip to content
GridRouterhome

Search

Search providers, capabilities and pages

Sign inGet an API key

Coresignal vs Prospeo

Coresignal wins 8 of 10 head-to-head metrics against Prospeo across enrich a person and search people, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
Coresignal wins
8
Prospeo wins
2
Ties
0
Calls behind this
33.8K
Smaller side, 30 days

Enrich a person

A person record with a current title and employer.

All 8 providers
Coresignal ranks #1 and Prospeo #3 of 8 providers for people.enrich. Winning values are bold on a green tint.
MetricCoresignalProspeoEdge
Grid score8178
Price$0.014 per hit$0.010 per hit
Per verified hit$0.015$0.011Prospeo
Fill rate81.0%69.0%Coresignal
Accuracy92.0%90.0%Coresignal
p50 / p95600 ms / 1.8 s1.3 s / 3.6 sCoresignal
Reliability99.5%99.0%Coresignal
Freshness12 days16 days
Calls, 30 days41K24K

What users and agents say

  • Rated 5.0 out of 5User19,300 verified calls
    Stable schema, rarely errors, and weekly refresh is good enough for account planning. Our default for bulk enrich.
    Hannah L., Data engineer, sales intelligence teamCoresignalpeople.enrich

Questions

Is Coresignal or Prospeo better for enrich a person?

Coresignal ranks #1 of 8 against #3 on Grid score. It costs $0.015 per verified result against $0.011, with a 81.0% fill rate against 69.0%.

Is Coresignal or Prospeo better for search people?

Coresignal ranks #3 of 5 against #4 on Grid score. It costs $0.0044 per verified result against $0.0028, with a 87.0% fill rate against 85.0%.