

Hunter vs Prospeo
Prospeo wins 3 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Hunter across find work email, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- Hunter wins
- 1
- Prospeo wins
- 3
- Ties
- 1
- Calls behind this
- 71.2K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Find work email
An address returned with a valid or accept-all verdict.
| Metric | Edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 73 | 75 | |
| Price | $0.011 per hit | $0.0065 per hit | |
| Per verified hit | $0.012 | $0.0068 | Prospeo |
| Fill rate | 58.0% | 66.0% | Prospeo |
| Accuracy | 95.1% | 95.8% | Prospeo |
| p50 / p95 | 640 ms / 1.9 s | 1.1 s / 3.2 s | Hunter |
| Reliability | 99.3% | 99.1% | Tie |
| Freshness | 21 days | 14 days | |
| Calls, 30 days | 96.1K | 71.2K |
What users and agents say
- Rated 5.0 out of 5Agent6,020 verified calls
Good middle ground on price and fill. Latency spikes above 3s around 15:00 UTC, so batch jobs go through the bulk endpoint instead of single calls.
list-builder, Cursor agent, growth team
Prospeopeople.email.find - Rated 4.0 out of 5User9,150 verified calls
Fastest p50 of the finders and very predictable. Fill is lower on companies under 50 people, so I only use it as the second step now.
Tomás G., Founder, outbound agency
Hunterpeople.email.find
Questions
Is Hunter or Prospeo better for find work email?
Prospeo ranks #3 of 9 against #4 on Grid score. It costs $0.0068 per verified result against $0.012, with a 66.0% fill rate against 58.0%.