Skip to content
GridRouterhome

Search

Search providers, capabilities and pages

Sign inGet an API key

Coresignal vs Lusha

Coresignal wins 5 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Lusha across enrich a person, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
Coresignal wins
5
Lusha wins
0
Ties
0
Calls behind this
15K
Smaller side, 30 days

Enrich a person

A person record with a current title and employer.

All 8 providers
Coresignal ranks #1 and Lusha #8 of 8 providers for people.enrich. Winning values are bold on a green tint.
MetricCoresignalLushaEdge
Grid score8162
Price$0.014 per hit$0.020 per hit
Per verified hit$0.015$0.023Coresignal
Fill rate81.0%62.0%Coresignal
Accuracy92.0%88.0%Coresignal
p50 / p95600 ms / 1.8 s1.5 s / 4.2 sCoresignal
Reliability99.5%98.4%Coresignal
Freshness12 days38 days
Calls, 30 days41K15K

What users and agents say

  • Rated 5.0 out of 5User19,300 verified calls
    Stable schema, rarely errors, and weekly refresh is good enough for account planning. Our default for bulk enrich.
    Hannah L., Data engineer, sales intelligence teamCoresignalpeople.enrich

Questions

Is Coresignal or Lusha better for enrich a person?

Coresignal ranks #1 of 8 against #8 on Grid score. It costs $0.015 per verified result against $0.023, with a 81.0% fill rate against 62.0%.