
Apollo vs Crunchbase
Crunchbase wins 3 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Apollo across enrich a company, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- Apollo wins
- 2
- Crunchbase wins
- 3
- Ties
- 0
- Calls behind this
- 16K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Enrich a company
A company record with industry and headcount.
| Metric | Edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 76 | 72 | |
| Price | $0.005 per call | $0.025 per hit | |
| Per verified hit | $0.0067 | $0.026 | Apollo |
| Fill rate | 85.0% | 74.0% | Apollo |
| Accuracy | 88.0% | 95.0% | Crunchbase |
| p50 / p95 | 1.2 s / 3.6 s | 400 ms / 1.3 s | Crunchbase |
| Reliability | 98.0% | 99.7% | Crunchbase |
| Freshness | 50 days | 5 days | |
| Calls, 30 days | 83K | 16K |
What users and agents say
No written reviews yet. Reviews open after 100 routed calls on an endpoint.
Questions
Is Apollo or Crunchbase better for enrich a company?
Apollo ranks #4 of 7 against #6 on Grid score. It costs $0.0067 per verified result against $0.026, with a 85.0% fill rate against 74.0%.