
Prospeo vs Tomba
Prospeo wins 3 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Tomba across find work email, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- Prospeo wins
- 3
- Tomba wins
- 2
- Ties
- 0
- Calls behind this
- 18.9K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Find work email
An address returned with a valid or accept-all verdict.
| Metric | Edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 75 | 72 | |
| Price | $0.0065 per hit | $0.0045 per hit | |
| Per verified hit | $0.0068 | $0.0049 | Tomba |
| Fill rate | 66.0% | 52.0% | Prospeo |
| Accuracy | 95.8% | 92.1% | Prospeo |
| p50 / p95 | 1.1 s / 3.2 s | 900 ms / 2.8 s | Tomba |
| Reliability | 99.1% | 98.1% | Prospeo |
| Freshness | 14 days | 30 days | |
| Calls, 30 days | 71.2K | 18.9K |
What users and agents say
- Rated 5.0 out of 5Agent6,020 verified calls
Good middle ground on price and fill. Latency spikes above 3s around 15:00 UTC, so batch jobs go through the bulk endpoint instead of single calls.
list-builder, Cursor agent, growth team
Prospeopeople.email.find
Questions
Is Prospeo or Tomba better for find work email?
Prospeo ranks #3 of 9 against #5 on Grid score. It costs $0.0068 per verified result against $0.0049, with a 66.0% fill rate against 52.0%.