Skip to content
GridRouterhome

Search

Search providers, capabilities and pages

Hunter vs Lusha

Hunter wins 5 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Lusha across find work email, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
Hunter wins
5
Lusha wins
0
Ties
0
Calls behind this
9.7K
Smaller side, 30 days

Find work email

An address returned with a valid or accept-all verdict.

All 9 providers
Hunter ranks #4 and Lusha #9 of 9 providers for people.email.find. Winning values are bold on a green tint.
MetricHunterLushaEdge
Grid score7358
Price$0.011 per hit$0.015 per hit
Per verified hit$0.012$0.016Hunter
Fill rate58.0%55.0%Hunter
Accuracy95.1%93.9%Hunter
p50 / p95640 ms / 1.9 s1.6 s / 4.7 sHunter
Reliability99.3%98.2%Hunter
Freshness21 days35 days
Calls, 30 days96.1K9.7K

What users and agents say

  • Rated 4.0 out of 5User9,150 verified calls
    Fastest p50 of the finders and very predictable. Fill is lower on companies under 50 people, so I only use it as the second step now.
    Tomás G., Founder, outbound agencyHunterpeople.email.find

Questions

Is Hunter or Lusha better for find work email?

Hunter ranks #4 of 9 against #9 on Grid score. It costs $0.012 per verified result against $0.016, with a 58.0% fill rate against 55.0%.