

Hunter vs Lusha
Hunter wins 5 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Lusha across find work email, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- Hunter wins
- 5
- Lusha wins
- 0
- Ties
- 0
- Calls behind this
- 9.7K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Find work email
An address returned with a valid or accept-all verdict.
| Metric | Edge | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 73 | 58 | |
| Price | $0.011 per hit | $0.015 per hit | |
| Per verified hit | $0.012 | $0.016 | Hunter |
| Fill rate | 58.0% | 55.0% | Hunter |
| Accuracy | 95.1% | 93.9% | Hunter |
| p50 / p95 | 640 ms / 1.9 s | 1.6 s / 4.7 s | Hunter |
| Reliability | 99.3% | 98.2% | Hunter |
| Freshness | 21 days | 35 days | |
| Calls, 30 days | 96.1K | 9.7K |
What users and agents say
- Rated 4.0 out of 5User9,150 verified calls
Fastest p50 of the finders and very predictable. Fill is lower on companies under 50 people, so I only use it as the second step now.
Tomás G., Founder, outbound agency
Hunterpeople.email.find
Questions
Is Hunter or Lusha better for find work email?
Hunter ranks #4 of 9 against #9 on Grid score. It costs $0.012 per verified result against $0.016, with a 58.0% fill rate against 55.0%.