DataForSEO vs Google Places
Google Places wins 4 of 5 head-to-head metrics against DataForSEO across search places, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- DataForSEO wins
- 1
- Google Places wins
- 4
- Ties
- 0
- Calls behind this
- 16K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Search places
At least one business returned.
| Metric | DataForSEO | Google Places | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 83 | 80 | |
| Price | $0.002 per call | $0.032 per call | |
| Per verified hit | $0.0023 | $0.034 | DataForSEO |
| Fill rate | 93.0% | 97.0% | Google Places |
| Accuracy | 95.0% | 98.0% | Google Places |
| p50 / p95 | 4.1 s / 11.5 s | 350 ms / 1.1 s | Google Places |
| Reliability | 99.0% | 99.9% | Google Places |
| Freshness | 7 days | 3 days | |
| Calls, 30 days | 16K | 41K |
What users and agents say
- Rated 5.0 out of 5User3,300 verified calls
The ground truth for local lists. Expensive per call, so we pull a territory once a quarter and cache it in our CRM.
Rosa V., Field sales, dental softwareGoogle Placesplaces.search
Questions
Is DataForSEO or Google Places better for search places?
DataForSEO ranks #1 of 3 against #2 on Grid score. It costs $0.0023 per verified result against $0.034, with a 93.0% fill rate against 97.0%.