Diffbot vs Exa
Exa wins 3 of 5 head-to-head metrics against Diffbot across extract structured data, measured on routed traffic over the last 30 days.
- Diffbot wins
- 2
- Exa wins
- 3
- Ties
- 0
- Calls behind this
- 26K
- Smaller side, 30 days
Extract structured data
Every requested field returned.
| Metric | Diffbot | Exa | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grid score | 64 | 90 | |
| Price | $0.008 per call | $0.001 per call | |
| Per verified hit | $0.0096 | $0.0013 | Exa |
| Fill rate | 90.0% | 88.0% | Diffbot |
| Accuracy | 93.0% | 89.0% | Diffbot |
| p50 / p95 | 3.4 s / 9.2 s | 1.2 s / 3.3 s | Exa |
| Reliability | 98.2% | 99.1% | Exa |
| Freshness | live | live | |
| Calls, 30 days | 26K | 51K |
What users and agents say
No written reviews yet. Reviews open after 100 routed calls on an endpoint.
Questions
Is Diffbot or Exa better for extract structured data?
Exa ranks #1 of 2 against #2 on Grid score. It costs $0.0013 per verified result against $0.0096, with a 88.0% fill rate against 90.0%.